When Chad became an oil producer its needy people anticipated benefiting from the incredibly profitable industry. Instead, the World Bank has frozen the country’s wealth in London bank accounts. Edmund Sanders reports.

When Chad became an oil producer its needy people anticipated benefiting from the incredibly profitable industry. Instead, the World Bank has frozen the country’s wealth in London bank accounts. Edmund Sanders reports

O utside the gleaming white fences of a multibillion-dollar American petroleum complex, a slum dreams of becoming a boom town.

Thousands of people have flocked to the small village of Kome in southern Chad over the years, hoping their country’s newfound oil wealth would translate into jobs and prosperity. But most remain unemployed, living in huts on garbage-strewn, dirt streets with neither electricity nor running water.

Relations between the village and an ExxonMobil Corp-led consortium across the street are so strained that oil workers are now banned by their employer from patronizing local bars and other shops in the village. When fire raced through the slum in March, oil company fire trucks watched from the other side of the fence, witnesses said.

“They said our children would get jobs,” said Benoit Djimrane Njarounda, who moved to the area more than a decade ago and now serves as the village’s chief. “There were so many promises. What happened?”

Three years after this poor, landlocked central African country joined the league of oil-producing nations, there are growing – and familiar – complaints that petroleum money is not getting to those most in need. For most of this year, Chad’s oil wealth has been frozen in London bank accounts after adispute with the World Bank.

As he led an ox across a plot of dirt to plant millet for his family, Joseph Bailessem, 27, lamented that he lacked the skills and education needed for a job at the plant. Worse yet, he said, his children, who were helping him till the soil, are missing out on their education because promised classrooms have yet to open.

“Where is the oil money going?” he asked. “White people are the only ones benefiting.”

Just a few years ago, Chad was held up as a model for how a developing nation could avoid the curse of oil and ensure that money did not disappear into bureaucrats’ bank accounts, as seen in Nigeria, Sudan and Gabon.

Thanks to decades of internal strife and its reputation as one of the world’s most corrupt countries, this former French colony was unable to attract investment partners to develop its oil fields until the World Bank agreed in 2000 to back a US$4 billion (HK$31.2 billion) deal to build a pipeline from Chad to the Atlantic coastline of neighboring Cameroon.

In return for its participation, the World Bank secured strict conditions on how the Chad government’s share of the profit could be spent. Some 10 percent would be set aside in a “future generations” fund; 72 percent was earmarked to fight poverty by spending on health, education and roads; 13.5 percent would go to government coffers and the remaining 4.5 percent to local communities affected by the development.

By the end of 2005, the government had received about US$420 million, nearly doubling its annual income.

But tracking where the money went is not so simple. A major chunk, more than US$74 million in 2005, was allocated for new roads, according to Chad’s independent oil oversight committee.

Oil funds helped lay one new toll road to the south and are being used for a 640-kilometer highway to the east. Still, paved roads remain a rarity in Chad – three times the size of California – even in the capital of N’Djamena.

Aside from the new roads, government officials are hard-pressed to describe large-scale benefits of the oil funds. They talk about smaller projects: a new school fence and some renovated classrooms in the capital, HIV testing clinics, a water tower in the southern city of Doba.

Much of the work remains unfinished. Government leaders have urged patience.

“People are complaining because the programs haven’t reached them yet, but they will,” said Njarindo Milongar, a member of parliament who also chairs the committee that controls money earmarked for communities affected by oil development.

Critics, however, say much of the money is being squandered. Mekombe Therese, vice president of the independent oversight committee charged with monitoring the use of oil proceeds, said her group’s analysis of spending in 2004 and 2005 found that 40 percent to 45 percent of oil money fell victim to waste, corruption, nepotism, shoddy work or delinquent contractors.

For example, a venture involving the brother of Chadian President Idriss Deby received one of the biggest road construction contracts; committee examiners found a US$1 million university grant was being held in the rector’s personal bank account; a year after spending US$800,000 for three new schools, none had been completed despite a six-month deadline. And new desks provided by another contractor are already falling apart, Therese said.

“The government needs to take action against those who have not fulfilled their obligations, but they are not doing enough,” Therese said.

Instead, Deby launched a campaign against the World Bank to seize control over more of Chad’s oil royalties. Late last year, Chad’s parliament unilaterally scrapped the 10 percent “future generations” fund, doubled the government’s take of profit to 30 percent and expanded the definition of “poverty reducing” sectors to include such things as the military, energy development and legal reform.

Chad’s oil riches represent both opportunity and peril for Deby, experts say. If Deby survives another year in office, he’ll control assets worth billions of dollars. On the other hand, oil money has made the once-obscure African nation a much more attractive target, to both rebels and other countries.

Chadian officials accuse Sudan and China of backing its rebels. The United States, which gets about 18 percent of its imported oil from Africa, also is taking a more active interest.

“The oil war in Chad is beginning,” said Chadian economist Ali Haggar, a former adviser to Deby.

The World Bank has responded by suspending activities in Chad, effectively freezing the bank accounts holding the nation’s oil funds. As a result, none of the estimated US$270 million in 2006 royalties has been released.

At one point, Deby angrily threatened to shut down the oil fields if the funds weren’t released. Under a truce, the World Bank is preparing to disburse some money as long as Chad pledges to abide by some of the original conditions. Negotiations over a long-term settlement continue.

Officials in Chad blame the World Bank for halting their poverty projects. “We have so much work to do in Chad and our investments have been blocked by the World Bank,” said Mahamat Ali Hassan, minister of economy, planning and cooperation. “I’m really confused.”

World Bank officials said they were left with little choice after the government altered the terms of the original agreement.

“It was a decision taken very reluctantly, yet one which we believed was necessary in order to protect the original goals of the project, namely to ensure the money went to poverty-reducing public spending,” Ali Khadr, the director of the World Bank’s Chad operation, wrote in an e-mail to the Los Angeles Times.

In some ways, rising oil prices have weakened the World Bank’s hand in negotiations.

The oil consortium, including ExxonMobil, Chevron and Petronas of Malaysia, originally predicted that profit would not flow until 2008, based on projected oil prices of US$15 a barrel for crude. With prices above US$70 a barrel, the consortium began reporting a profit this year.

By taxing the consortium’s earnings, the government now stands to receive a windfall next year that officials in Chad say could total US$1 billion, far exceeding the royalties they’ve been receiving.

So far there are no laws or World Bank provisions that restrict the use of such tax revenue, though World Bank officials hope to include that money in the new agreement.

Executives at ExxonMobil and its subsidiary, Esso Exploration & Production Chad, declined to comment.

A recent quarterly report by the consortium expressed hope that the government and the World Bank would resolve the dispute.

On its Web site, ExxonMobil cites its contributions to assisting Chadians, saying it has spent nearly US$610 million on goods and services from local suppliers, US$8.75 million on community projects such as schools and wells, and more than US$9 million in compensation to individuals and landowners affected by its operations. The consortium says 83 percent of its 7,300 workers are Chadian.

But few of those jobs have gone to the hopeful men and women living outside the gates of the oil facility. A few years ago, they dubbed their slum “Satan” for its bars and brothels. Later, they dropped the first letter and changed the name to Atan, which sounds like the French word for “wait,” to reflect their growing impatience.

LOS ANGELES TIMES

Find More Other News : Gold Mine, Oil & Gas